YouTrack Support | JetBrains

Dmitry Krasilschikov

Total activity 826
Last activity April 11, 2016 09:09
Member since September 21, 2009 11:33
Following 0 users
Followed by 0 users
Votes 0
Subscriptions 307

Created May 06, 2013 09:51

Hi Yann,please pay attention that it's needed to use tag reference (e.g. {tag: tagname}) but not tag name as parameter. Look at the JT-18880 for details.
- 0 votes
Created May 07, 2013 14:08

It better to compare tags on equality using "tag1_name".eq("tag2_name") method.Also, relates.removeTag("{tag:Livré}"); definitely won't work, expected to use relates.removeTag({tag:Livré});, withou...
- 0 votes
Created May 08, 2013 11:52

Tag removing works fine on my environment.Let's reduce the problem. So, please write the simple workflow to make sure that basically tags are removed:rule tag removing when Priority.changed { ...
- 0 votes
Created May 08, 2013 15:14

What the Workflow Editor version are you using? Please update to the latest.
- 0 votes
Created May 06, 2013 10:02

Hi dd ofborg,please comment/vote the feature request JT-11111.Any time you can report a issue into our YouTrack - http://youtrack.jetbrains.com/
- 0 votes
Created March 14, 2013 11:11

Yes, because 'now' is the current timestamp, but not only the today date.
- 0 votes
Created April 16, 2013 10:53

Hi Josh,I'm working on the rich reference about the workflow language.
- 0 votes
Created March 19, 2013 13:17

Hi Tom,it seems that either the reporter isn't included into the project 'assignees' set or the logged in user hasn't permissions to modify the 'Assignee' field.
- 0 votes
Created February 14, 2013 16:28

Basically yes, but should be corrected a little:when becomesReported() { permittedGroup = {group: Default Group here} } The other variant also can be considered, this workflow sets permitted gr...
- 0 votes
Created February 19, 2013 16:40

It's better to define the allowing modifications as condition: rule Lock project when !relates to.changed && !subtask of.changed && !parent for.changed && !duplicates.changed && !is duplicated b...
- 0 votes